@nota beneTo those who regard foreign trade in its normal condition as a fair interchange of goods, and services, it may seem difficult to understand how these economic interests expect to exclude foreign goods from their market, while at the same time pushing their goods in foreign markets. But we must remind such economists that the prime motive force here is not trade but investment: a surplus of exports over imports is sought as the most profitable mode of investment, and when a nation, or more strictly its investing classes, is bent on becoming a creditor or parasitic nation to an indefinite extent, there is no reason why its imports and exports should balance even over a long term of years. The whole struggle of so-called Imperialism upon its economic side is towards a growing parasitism, and the classes engaged in this struggle require Protection as their most serviceable instrument.
back 2547990cd7cd66abf67ebabe159f8fbe8efcd618f7e2f80044de198fd6b273f5
⎄ era stable
⎄ cosine similarity lock text similarity measure
⎄ cryptocryptics lock enabled cryptographic identity enforced
cipherlink 32ac2219191bd6aa5e17397f02b69ec21a02fec225b26d608e779e3e0375bc22